Narendra Nirmal Jana
Email: narenjana@narenjana.com
Email: narenj5@protonmail.com
December 3rd 2020 Asylum Interview:
Home Office Reference #: J1989785
Application ASC #: ASC/5271126
*Post Interview Substantiative Documents Section
*Substantiative Documents Post Interview
*Medical Documents Section
*Medical Doctors Causing Harm is Clinical Settings Section
*Medical Doctors Causing Harm is Clinical Settings Section
Showing Google's Criminality to Support the US and Explaining Why the US is Adamant about Limiting Litigation
It should be known that its not only the medical doctors that perpetuated harm in medical setting that have an interest in limiting litigation in the US but also technology companies (possibly led by US military) within the US that perpetuated malice that have a vested interest in limiting litigation. Why? Because companies like google (google being the largest and easiest to show criminal) practiced a form of digital malice to support the US in causing medical harm and then using the harm caused medically to effect me in other ways. According to this pattern: Its known that the US recruited google to try and hide some of my email data that indicated research material around my clinical condition. The idea is that if the email data is inconvenient to the US then simply hide or erase email data. Google often hides search results that indicate the medical basis of my clinical condition (delist search results). For example they tried to erase a video screen shot of another patient with the same clinical condition here, in my email: The screen shot and those videos are inconvenient to both google and the united states because it shows the clinical condition and neurodegeneration is due to a doctor that practiced negligence to intellectual disfigurment in 2008, Dr. Evan Murray. But I saved a local copy of the screenshot: So google tried to "clean" the screenshot and video data to support Dr. Evan Murray and the US in medical negligence. They will also try to clean all data that implicates Google in malice. But Google's involvment is far more than this, I video recorded Google committing digital crimes (NSFW). The idea by Google (as directed by the US) was simple, take delisted internet content websites with illegal pornographic content and append it to the very top of my search result list (these videos are NSFW) with titles not indicative of the content of the sight. But why always the very first search result? Because google statistically figured out that users always click the very first search result. It became the basis of google replacing the first search result with an ad for google's ad space. (now its an ad made to look like a search result). Demonstrated here: There isnt much intelligence behind Google's malice, its a simple intentionally append a illegal content website to the first result in any search term as a targeted audience of the US. But other search engines are also implicated in digital malice. This is Microsoft Bing appending illegal web content results to the top of their search results: The third search result from an unrelated search string on bing contains illegal web content as directed in malice by the united states. Digital Malice. Bing has another problem, I had never used bing before (bing has no cookie or metadata from my IP address) and yet bing has posted illegal content as directed by the US. There is no historical use of bing because I hadnt used a windows pc for almost a decade then. (I use Safari on Mac with its default search engine). Thus it could be concluded that the US is posting illegal webcontent intentionally for any search over several search engines simultaneously to a specific targeted user, me. Yahoo also posted illegal webcontent suggestive of the same illegal content posted on google and bing, videoed here (third link): Google in this case isnt only targeting my specific user account but they are also targeting me by IP designation and also by cookie/metadata (outside my user account). Google still does this and did this repetitively and incessisantly in the past. I complained to google about their direction by the US in intentionally appending illegal content: This 2018 message to google states "I have complained about this historically Google. You are appending illegal content to the top of the listing of google searches over common search strings. This content has been illegal by law for ages so this is clearly unacceptable. Its odd what large copmanies....." Google kept posting illegal content on the web so I complained about it again. I specifically stated that google ignores even the safe search option on their search results. Google disregarded all safe search options when targeting me and follows the same pattern as before, appending illegal content to the first search result. I stated "Google has been weird, creepy, and unlawfully appending objectionable content to higher listings recently".... I have seen really really objectionable content as well recently (stuff thats automatically filtered from the web historically and well beyond safe search turned on criteria) for simple searches. Its unlawful and illegal on the part of google." My violent reaction to it is because google had appended a website result as the first result with snuff content (extremely illegal). They disregarded all internet safety laws. This example is continued here: Google didnt care, they simply became more aggressive about posting illegal web content to my search results as a targeted audiance in US's malice. This time Google, in malice, intentionally appended videos of beastiality as a first search results in a unrelated search string (NSFW). Clear gross illegality by google. You should notice how they insert illegal content into websites, thats its illegal and strategic on their part. They are aggressive and mindless. My frustration with google became so great by 2017, with repetitively obnoxious postings by google that I created a new google ID called, goo0gleislowbrow5@gmail.com. Indicating that google was acting in a lowbrow manner, google didn't appear to understand what lowbrow was and continued their illegal behavior. Here google posts a offensive video inbetween a playlist of music videos. With clear evidence it shows that I am a targeted audiance of google. The offensive material (with a title of "What Happens When You Inbreed?") is in no way related to the playlist of only music videos and isnt related to any former google search of mine (its not a listing from google's metaanalysis of former searches). It is related to the first illegal content website posted on this page (google reitterating their illegality in other forms). (all my google searches and internet data are stored in a database that spans almost a decade, so its easy to show that these offensive postings are by google and not a result of the user): Whether google is posting outright illegal content on the web or content suggestive of googles illegality on the web, I am still their targeted audiance. Google also tried to hide evidence of posting illegal content: (February 15th) Google Tries to Hide Evidence of Google Posting Illegal Webcontent This video here demonstrates that google is following this cycle in perpetuating malice by the US: Citing Google also implicates Facebook (they often work in partnership to create illegal or offensive content). A Google search result will often have illegal or offensive Facebook web content as the first search result. This video here shows how Google works in partnership with Facebook in a form of digital malice: Google works in partnership with Facebook It goes even further than this I recorded all my internet data spanning over a decade, and since Google predominates as a search engine its easy to show their malice as directed by the US. I have a massive overabundance to data to substantiate my case against all the internet tech companies. So there is a vested interest among tech companies in the US to limit litigation by me due to the clear criminality of companies like google. Keeping this case outside of court is a way of not acknowledging their crime or malice. Google has an inability to admit to the illegality of their illegal malice so their idea is to further harm the the person being effected negatively (me) or render them defenseless. Furthering medical harm to intellectual disfigurment and mutilation, but not only by medical doctors but by technology companies like google. This public statement of lawlessness is only partially coming for a doctor avoiding criminal charges. Its coming from a technology company that wouldnt like to admit to their illegality. |
Video Explanation of Social Networking and Internet Malice Topics |