Facebook limits users in Facebook to communicate with me. Since Facebook acquired WhatsApp, they also limit it within WhatsApp now. (We believe this is US military directed).
But what about postings by individual users on facebook? Have they revealed the intent of the US?
Yes.
Facebook ocassionally publicized the intent of people in social settings in the US as well (after all its a social network). In this perticular example a facebook friend, Gilad Skolnick, friended a new person with a pseudonym Noa Standwithus:
"Stand with us" is an indication that people in the US are standing together against me in this type of malice:
They also know that I am a refugee in a foreign nation and post ads with respect to it (its not a reitteration of a search string):
The add states, UNILAD or restated a statement of "UN" United Nations is ill. A reference to the 1951 refugee convestion.
It should be known that the sensored parts of the videos here (all of them) also contain other targeted content by facebook but could only be presented with a legal intermediary.
This video here shows how Google also works in partnership with Facebook in a form of digital malice:
Though a little but more sophisiticated then google, facebook tends to post offensive user content to the top of its search results similar to google.
Lets denote the relative sophistication of facebook in taking a former example and seeing its relation to Facebook.
Looking at this particular example you could state, "it makes sense in context". An atheist would make the statement that "Scientists Have Established a Link Between Brain Damage and Religious Fundamentalism" and it also makes sense that it would come from the Boston Atheists Group. That statement is a valid statement that has a medical basis, which is explained here:
Epilepsy Could Cause Hyperreligiosity
But how do I show that it's a statement coming for the US and facebook as much as a statement coming from the Boston Atheist Group?
Simple, do random repetitive searches on Facebook to run their automated scripts to determine in what relative frequency facebook is appending topics relating to religiosity in their search results and not individual users posting topics about religiously.
Lets do a search with common popular names from a popular name database of people who arent in my facebook friend list (randomized).
It's a statistical method of determining in what frequency facebook is advertising specific content to a user as a targeted audience. Then you could determine that the posting and appending of the statement by the Boston Atheist Group is as much by the Boston Atheist Group as facebook.
Google also does this. Any unrelated search term (string) often has results pertaining to religiosity (note the "Ezekiel 23:20" in a unrelated search string).
But how do we know that I have never searched topics pertaining to religiosity on facebook (or google)? If you search a topic pertaining to religiosity on facebook it may simply be a reitteration of former search meta analysis searched by the user.
To show thats its not a meta analysis result I could reference my saved internet database which also has all facebook related searches listed as much as google searches:
But the user (me) has never searched topics relating to religiosity on facebook (or any other setting for that matter) so then it becomes a targeted advertisement by facebook and not a meta analysis result of facebook.
Thus demonstrating that the ads are coming from facebook and the US as much as the groups being advertised in the results.
The US is feigning a propensity to religiosity by repetitively advertising topics pertaining to religiosity to the user incongruent to the search terms by the US while intentionally and knowingly mistreating a person with a clear neurological condition.
They are fully aware of what they are doing.
Video Explanation of the structure of Facebook Postings