Glibly stated, the US does very odd things in social settings to try and limit any social interaction in the US (the goal is complete isolation).
You could also use the internet postings to show that scale of social malice in the US, its massive. But what did the US do in interpersonal settings in the US to limit forming any friends networks or social relationships?
Its simple, I didn't know any people when I moved to New York City in 2014 when I was 29 and then San Diego in 2017.
Literally in all social settings the US replaced all people my age in meetup groups that I signed up for with people far older than me. So if I was 29, the people in the groups would always be greater than 50 and that's in whatever group I signed up for.
This is in my 2014 walking group in NYC. All people before the statue are in my meetup group:
This is in my 2017 meetup group in San Diego.
Notice how everyone in the group is older than 50 years old except maybe 2 people? Thats intentional by the US to limit social interaction with those in my age group (the US tried this in England as well, its a predictable behavior of the US).
It was a weird and an odd type of malice.
Well ofcourse a person in their 20s couldn't really find much commonality with people in their 50s, so that became US's way of limiting social interaction.
But this agenda was predefined by US's internet behavior, if you couldn't digitally isolate a person using facebook you could do it through an age gap to limit the formation of appropriate relationships with people my age or people with my relatively younger mentality of any age.
It's a divide between psychology and intentional social isolation in the US.
You could pick out the agenda by looking at this meetup list from 2017:
Its easy to pick out the malice in US social settings.
In this case the US canceled two large groups (the International Friends and Tall Sandiegans Groups) so only people in a older age bracket would be at a social event (the Liquid Blue event). Videoed below:
Notice how the band is directed towards younger people but the audiance is greater than 50:
It was an odd if not mentally ill form of social malice.
This is in additional to limiting any and all digital forms of communication on facebook and other digital social networks with the explicit reason to completely isolate me.
The US, generally speaking, does weird, oddball, and predictable things to perpetuate malice in different ways.
Those Who are Used by the US to Perpetuate Social Malice By Force and not Choice
A realization in those who perpetuate social malice is that they are either intellectually impoverished (have a limited intellect) or suffer from social economic disparity and are desperate for some sort of personal gain.
I believe the US is using socioeconomic disparity of different countries in a way to harm me. The social malice in the US had already spanned for more than a decade before with clear evidence. You could guess that this continued pattern was due to US's predefined attempts at social malice, most of which as described above was oddball behavior by the country (you could typify the country as odd in their attempts).
I never understood why but I believe its because of the US's direction in long standing social malice and their force to make people act in social malice against their own choice.
Video Explanation of Social Networking and Internet Malice Topics