Narendra Nirmal Jana

Email: narenjana@narenjana.com

Email: narenj5@protonmail.com

December 3rd 2020 Asylum Interview:

Home Office Reference #: J1989785

Application ASC #: ASC/5271126

A Governmental Malice

More than anything else it gives evidence of the scale of malice in this case perpetuated by the US and how it became governmental policy to mistreat me. Police and litigation are limited in the US to defend against the malice perpetuated by the US inside and outside of medical settings (as explained in the substantitive documents section).

Explained later in this document, internet search engines (google, bing, and yahoo) and social networks like facebook are also involved in the malice that took place in this case. All with clear evidence.

Its not explicitly stated by its inferentially stated that its the policy of the country to mistreat my condition (they often try to get more time to mistreat it knowing thats a progressive neurodegenerative condition). Its also not explicitly stated why but its know that there are some predefined guises to perpetuate malice.

When I was in san diego and went to a doctors appointments ocassionally, a black truck with an american flag would drive by me in the highway loudly stating "Trump Card" (an implicit statement). Trump was the president that point in time. The doctors in san diego would then subsequently either falsify medical data or assault me in emergency settings.

Indicating a governmental role in medical mistreatment and then subsequent lack of legal protection from the perpetuated malice.

There were three or four separate occasions where a "trump card" truck would drive by me when going to a doctors appointment. Only two were recorded:

First occasion:

The second occasion:

Before donald trump became president I met one his family members and had an extended conversation with her. She appeared to know who I was, though I was a complete stranger.

I met Francine (a trump) when I lived in NYC in 2014 in a Starbucks, she described the history of her family. She fained that she didn't know how to use her cellphone and asked me. Then proceeded to show all her family photos on her cellphone and described each family member. She had a good autobiographical memory. She showed a picture of herself when she was younger (in her 20s). She specifically stated this about a trump family member, that "he wouldn't care if their kid fell off their balcony".

This may have been Trump's public statement in support of the malice during presidency: The presidents daughter, Ivanka, converted to orthodox judaism and changed her name to "Yael" (her Jewish name) which is the same first name as the Jewish high school student (who I didn't know) that went to the same university as me (Pennsylvania State University) and who appears to have perpetuated malice.

News sources would often publicize the intent of the US with respect to me then which I could show but only with a legal intermediary.

I believe this involvement was due to the long standing nature of malice within the US with respect to me (almost a decade then).

The mentality was.... perpetuate it because its been popular for a long time.